Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Why Barack Won

November 8th 2008 17:26
I know a lot of people might try to say, if a lot of people end up reading this, that this article makes me look racist. I grew up with a black brother, adopted when I was 18 months old and he was 6 weeks old. I have a black/Vietnamese sister that we adopted when I was five and she was 2 and a half. I judge people by the content of their character, and it was what I saw in Barack's character and his ultra-liberal policies that turned me to McCain, not the color of his skin. I would have vote for J. C. Watts or Condoleeza Rice or any of the other black conservatives that didn't spend the last 20 years in a CHURCH that preaches hate toward America and white. But read on.


Imagine if you will a white man mentored his entire teenage years by a communist party leader. This man then grows up and attends two very liberal colleges and works mobilizing people in work for a corrupt get out the vote organization. Upon entering his professional life, an unrepentant domestic terrorist picks him to distribute money to groups focused on radicalizing schools.

For twenty years this white man sits in a church where hate is preached against America and other, just for arguments sake, white people. He serves more with the unrepentant terrorist, launches a political career there and blurbs his book.

As part of a 10 year career in a state senate and 2 years in the US Senate this WHITE man only attaches his name to legislation and never actually crafts anything major. The things he attaches himself to in the US Senate are about as controversial as a resolution that “Puppies Are Cute.”

This white man comes out in speeches and says that American troops currently serving are “only air raiding villages and killing civilians.” This white man comes out and tells Planned Parenthood that they have his complete support for unlimited, any week in the pregnancy, federally funded abortions on demand nationwide. This white man tells a San Francisco panel that we need a judiciary that is for redistributing the wealth, but he wants to do it legislatively.


This white man’s only executive experience is running a small senate office and distributing money for the terrorist.

Now, despite all of this, this white man is a terrific speaker that can make people in a crowd sway. He can create glassy eyed audiences with his cadence and words.

This white man wouldn’t have beat Hillary Clinton in the primary with a stick in a back room! He would not have even become the candidate.

Race was the number one determining factor in this election. Yes, there were other important factors. Many people like socialism. There are many Gloria Steinem liberals that want unfettered, unlimited, federally funded abortion. There are many people that believe that no matter how hard they worked for it, rich people don’t deserve to keep what they make.

That’s all true. My point is that race was the overwhelming factor.

Major media ran with the assertion that bringing up socialism was a code word for black, even though socialism is a white European invention and concept.

Rev. Wright was off-limits to McCain because he didn’t want to be called a racist.

Stories abound of children that wore McCain shirts or buttons to school being sent home in tears by classmates bombarding them with calls of racist.

Time after time charges against Barack’s POLICIES were dismissed as racist, racially motivated or bigoted.

I’ve spoken to a lot of people who voted for Barack since the election. They didn’t know about his redistribution speech. They didn’t know he said his cap and trade plan would bankrupt the coal industry and cause “skyrocketing electricity prices.” They didn’t care about William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright.

They just wanted to make history. It wasn’t about issues, character, experience or judgment. It was about electing a black man president.

Even the media in the end announced they knew nothing about Obama. Check out the transcript of Charlie Rose and Tom Brokaw talking about how little we know about Barack on OCTOBER 31, 2008.

We elected the most liberal, most radical, most inexperienced and least transparent candidate in American history, for two reasons:

1) He was black (90% of the reason)
2) He was not a Republican (“George Bush is at fault for everything.”)

I know the country isn’t as left as Obama. In California, 61% of the population voted for Barack Obama and 52% of Californians voted to amend their constitution to ban gay marriage and teaching it as a lifestyle in schools! Barack won Florida with a much smaller margin but the gay marriage constitutional amendment passed easily. We’re a center-right country. In California, 96 out of a hundred black people voted for Obama. 7 out of 10 blacks vote FOR Proposition 8 and against gay marriage.

Yes, Barack ran a great campaign, though 65 million dollars of what he raised came from undocumented sources, and could have come from people violating the law by contributing over the limit and from illegal overseas sources.

But he stayed on message, became good at dismissing legitimate issues with a sarcastic comment. He stayed calm, appeared “presidential,” and behaved as if he will be a stead rudder during an economic crisis caused by Democrats with “affordable housing.”

No president has been more inappropriately blamed for our economic situation than President Bush. His number one mistake was not being louder from his bully pulpit in the 23 times since 2001 that he warned about the coming housing bubble and what it would do to our economy. In that way he allowed the democrats to demagogue and filibuster us into this recession.

No tax and spend policies could be much worse than Obama’s for bringing us out of it. Oprah’s staff is in for a big shock when she lays some of them off to keep some of her billions that she makes every year. Martha Stewart was asked what she would do when her taxes went up on her and her company. She waffled (pun intended) and wouldn’t say, but she better not lay people off. She better “make sacrifices,” as Barack said during his speech (did you notice that was when the crowd barely responded to him).

John McCain ran a horrible campaign. He didn’t mention in any of his ads that in the last eight years, 7 million jobs have been created. His best decision was picking Sarah Palin as VP, his worst was how he let his staff handle and prepare her. McCain was always extremely gracious, to a fault, sometimes sounding like he was campaigning for Barack. How in the world did his campaign staff miss the statements about bankrupting the coal industry and sending electricity prices skyrocketing. There was much more but that's for a later blog posting.

Barack is my president now, and per Romans 13 I will RESPECT the leaders God has put in authority over me. Good or bad, God puts them there for their time, whether to help the country prosper or to show it how much it has strayed, but either way as a Christian I must respect the position.

I will speak out against killing free speech with the Fairness Doctrine. I will speak out against the forced unionization of America with the Employee Free Forced Choice Act. I will oppose the “Freedom Of Choice Act,” which would make partial birth abortion and other late term abortion legal again and provide federal funding for abortion.

If Barack does succeed in getting his “Civilian defense force just as strong and well-funded as the military,” at that point he may have gone too far. Venezuela did the same thing and recently Chavez purchased AK-47’s from Russia to equip these ideological enforcers.

I will pray the filibusters in the Senate keep the radical things from even making it to Barack’s desk, but I have a feeling he will use the bully pulpit much better than Bush. President Bush was not the most eloquent speaker, to put it mildly, and the liberal media was ferocious in criticizing every little slip of the tongue. How many of you heard about Barack saying he had been to “57 states with one more to go but probably wouldn’t get to Alaska or Hawaii”?

I will pray that Barack doesn’t so offend and disillusion center-right America so bad that he taints all future black candidates. If he does not govern from the center, in a country so opposed to gay marriage (and California is the second most liberal state in the country, thus the 11 Billion dollar shortfall) and with 80% opposition to socialism, and 80% opposition to partial-birth abortion, he will go down as the worst president since Herbert Hoover.

I will pray that if Barack does turn out to be as bad a president as I believe he will be, whether I respect the position or not, people will say it was the content of his character that caused it, not the color of his skin.

I have a black brother and a black/Vietnamese sister. My brother voted for McCain, my sister I think I had convinced to vote McCain. I looked at Barack’s character, not his skin, in how I voted, and so did my brother. My other brothers and my other sister, looked at history. The media wanted to be a part of making history. They could have done that by being the McCain/Palin campaign extension instead of part of Barack’s. Every independent study shows them in the tank for Barack.

Socialism has failed everywhere it has been implemented. Europe’s economy runs much, much slower than ours and they are not even 100% socialist.

The only country in Europe to turn their economy around the last 10 years is Ireland, which disposed of much of socialism and set their corporate tax rate to 11% flat.

Conservative ideals and free markets work. Liberal policies kill economies.

Get ready for the worst recession since Jimmy Carter’s 12% inflation, 12% unemployment and 21% interest rates.

That’s the other half of the history that will be told. Obama will go down as our first black president, and the first president in 60 years to take us to double digit in all those categories. He will do what Joe Biden would do as President. It's why Joe Biden won less votes in the primaries than Sarah Palin won becoming mayor of Wasilla. I just sincerely pray people blame his policies and judgment, not the color of his skin.

I hope I can’t come back in a year and say “I told you so.” I hope in January 2013 we are swearing in President Sarah Palin.
77
Vote
Shared on
   


Poll Reality - Why McCain Could Be Pres

October 31st 2008 21:07
I've seen two reports now that polling companies are consistently reporting that they are getting 80% refuse to answer and hang up rates. That means to get 1,000 likely voters, they are having to call 5,000 people.

I believe it's safe to assume that people voting for Barack are more likely to want to share their support of The One. It's the thing to do. So many McCain supporters are getting called racist for supporting him, plus they believe the polls, especially from the Obamania media, are slanted to discourage them.

Therefore, I believe I can say confidently that McCain supporters are the majority of the non-responders on these polling calls.

Let's be conservative though. Let's say that of those 4,000 non-responders, it's 51% for McCain and 49% for Obama, ignoring those for Nader or McKinney. Rasmussen has the candidates currently at 51% Obama, 47% McCain.

In that case, if you factor in from among those 4,000 with the 1,000 that responded and you get 50.3% of the people voting for McCain and 49.7% for Obama. That's why Obama is going back to Iowa and still working so hard in states they appear to have locked up according to the polls.

If the ratio of the non-responders is 55/45, McCain will roll over Obama.

That's factor number one.

Factor number two is Operation Chaos run by Rush Limbaugh during the primary. During this, Rush encouraged Republicans in Pennsylvania and other late voting states to switch their registration to Democrat so they could vote for Hillary and prolong the battle. The thought, correctly, was that the more they tore each other up, the better for the Republicans.

When pollsters calculate their numbers, they use the number of registered members of each party to "weight" the results. They say "Hey, Democrats are 39% of registered voters, Repubs 33%, and Dems are going 89% for Obama," then weight their results using that. But if the numbers are wrong since the Operation Chaos participants don't have to change their registrations back in order to vote for McCain, then the weighting is wrong, and the polls are even closer than what they are releasing.

The NY Times latest poll even polled 33% more Democrats than Republicans. Um, yeah, Obama will be ahead in those polls.

Factor number three is outright, intentional lying to pollsters. One group that has admitted doing this is the PUMA's for Hillary. One of their members admitted to Sean Hannity on his radio show that they were telling pollsters they are voting for Obama to make him overconfident and that they are really voting for McCain. Obama has a new very sexist ad out too, which reduces Palin to a wink.

Add in the people who are afraid of being called racist by being openly out for McCain, or those that are racist but want to hide it, and you have a good solid block of wrong poll numbers.

I predict you will see McCain take every 2004 Bush state, plus Pennsylvania. I predict Chris Matthews will be crying and Olbermann will be screaming about fraud.

Proposition 8 in California may also get such a huge Republican and Conservative turn out that McCain pulls that out as well, since Dem voters with "something better to do" may think Obama is locked and go watch Survivor on their DVR . . . It happened to Bradley, as most people now feel that it wasn't Bradley's color, it was the anti-gun ballot initiative that brought out more conservative voters that cost Bradley the election.

Don't lose hope Conservatives. Go vote. Go get your friends to vote. We can win. Just stay away from big cities if McCain/Palin are elected. They won't be safe for a while.
60
Vote
Shared on
   


"Negative" Ads are Positively Essential

October 28th 2008 02:54
There's been a lot of huffing and puffing about "negative ads" over the last couple months. The Obama campaign seems to be the most vocally offended, even filing requests with the Department of Justice and the FEC to force ads off the air.

How do you define a negative ad? It's an ad about your opponent, not yourself. An example would be the William Ayers ads McCain ran.

The fact is, negative ads have been around since the dawn of democracy. Papers in 1860 were unmerciful on Lincoln, calling him a "scrawny stretched out piece of humanity too ugly for even politicians low standards."

Neither campaign can get away with that kind of screed these days. But they have accused each other of lying, being dishonorable, etc.

Negative ads are, however, essential. If you only allow candidates to talk about their good qualities, you could easily miss out on very important facts. For instance, if somebody was running with Hitler type ideas and desires, how would we know it but for a "negative" ad. If we had a candidate running that believed in taking the money of his defined level of rich and redistributing it to his definition of poor . . . oh wait, we already do.

Sometimes negative ads DO cross the line in our more polite society. For instance, Obama's campaign mocked John McCain for computer illiteracy, when the fact is Cindy has to type for him because of the injuries he suffered in the "Hanoi Hilton". McCain ran an ad suggesting that Illinois's governor and Chicago's mayor are under ethical clouds.

Who else would have talked about Ayers, Wright, Frank Davis, ACORN, etc but the McCain campaign? Do you hear Obama listing off his faults, except that he's maybe "too awesome."? Would McCain have raised the Keating 5 episode in which he was exonerated?

The fact is, we would not be able to make an educated, fully informed decision without negative advertising. A candidates faults can say a lot more about their fitness for office than their abilities.

See a negative ad that really makes you think? Go find out the truth. For instance, Obama is running ads that McCain will cut Medicare, which are completely false. In stump speeches he said retired people in Florida would be "privatized" in the stock market right now if McCain had had his way, when in fact you had to be born after 1958 to participate in the Bush privatization plan and even then you VOLUNTARILY could only redirect 25% of your income. Personally, I'd love it if 25% of my SS was going into the stock market right now when stocks are cheap.

But I digress. The next time somebody says to you, "So and so is just too negative," remind them of the story of the Emporer's clothes. Nobody wanted to go negative, so the emporer was naked. If pointing out the obvious concern is negative, please, go negative.
46
Vote
Shared on
   


If the woman is a conservative at least . . .

There is still racism in this country, but polls show it is actually benefitting Barack - 9% of people are voting for Obama because he's black, 6% against because he's black


[ Click here to read more ]
39
Vote
Shared on
   


McCain Commercials He Should Air

October 20th 2008 20:41
Here are the ads the McCain campaign should run:

Ad 1:
[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
Shared on
   


Obama's Radical Abortion Stance, Part ?

October 17th 2008 23:09
I've documented in other posts that most Americans are only for abortion being legal in the first half of a pregnancy, or to save the life of the mother, even in cases of rape or incest.

Yet, there are many Catholics and Evangelicals voting for Obama because he's cool


[ Click here to read more ]
50
Vote
Shared on
   


Arrgggh!

October 11th 2008 03:39
Sometimes I have those moments when people on TV make me so mad I want to climb into the TV and pour a bucket of ice water over their heads.

I'm so sick and tired o hearing that the mortgage mess was caused by the Republicans being against regulation. It's just not true


[ Click here to read more ]
48
Vote
Shared on
   


This is a multi-part series on the issues. Hopefully my readers will gain what they need to convince their liberal friends. I’m a conservative. I’m writing this from a conservative point of view and this is not meant as journalism, but commentary.

Some people want to deny it, but character matters. One of the biggest elements of character is judgment. You can judge character from a person’s record and by whom they hang out with. Out of all the character traits most important to a President, judgment is the greatest. Nobody is 100% ready to be President on day one, there are too many issues and no one person is an expert in everything. He or she has to have a cabinet for advice, then make the decision using their best judgment


[ Click here to read more ]
52
Vote
Shared on
   


One World Order?

October 8th 2008 20:02
I know I’ve been gone for a while. I haven’t posted as I’ve watched what’s happening with the bailout and the election. My day job has also kept me quite busy.

I’ve thought a lot about what’s going on, read a lot and listened to wise people. Some people, like Glenn Beck, talk about what’s happening without really recognizing what he’s saying


[ Click here to read more ]
42
Vote
Shared on
   


Watch the video embedded in this blog posting at realclearpolitics.com

Yup, Barney said everything is great, McCain said we need to get the GSE's under control. Gee, which party has been warning about this?
45
Vote
Shared on
   


More Posts
1 Posts
8 Posts
12 Posts
45 Posts dating from July 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Jonathan Biviano's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Jonathan Biviano
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]